-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25398/#review52613
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/AsyncModule.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/25398/#comment91463>

    Should these be @Positive instead (i.e. do we want to allow for a zero hold 
time/jitter window)?


- Joshua Cohen


On Sept. 8, 2014, 5:54 p.m., Joshua Cohen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/25398/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 8, 2014, 5:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-313
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-313
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Make the offer hold jitter window configurable.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/AsyncModule.java 
> 5a38a1f69ac5dbe68af3bfe175899ddee392880b 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/RandomJitterReturnDelay.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/RandomJitterReturnDelayTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25398/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> gradle -Pq build
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joshua Cohen
> 
>

Reply via email to