> On Nov. 17, 2014, 9:48 p.m., Zameer Manji wrote:
> > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/filter/SchedulingFilter.java, 
> > line 108
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/28103/diff/2/?file=765455#file765455line108>
> >
> >     I'm a little worried that we have to add yet another class to represent 
> > resources in the cluster.
> >     
> >     It's not blocking this review but I would like to know your thoughts on 
> > this.

This type of new encapsulation is a good thing for future consolidation, as it 
calls out a previously-hidden use case.  That said, we should avoid 
consolidation just because of a noun clash - it should become obvious when two 
disparate types are serving the same purpose.


- Bill


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28103/#review61818
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 16, 2014, 10:29 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28103/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 16, 2014, 10:29 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Simplify Preemptor code, encapsulate fields used there and in 
> SchedulingFilter.
> 
> A lot of this addressing Law of Demeter violations, such as accepting 
> `IAssignedTask` when only `ITaskConfig` and task ID were needed.  There are 
> also (what i consider) readability improvements in `SchedulingFilterImpl` and 
> `PreemptorImpl`.
> 
> The broader goal here is to simplify the code usedin scheduling, hopefully to 
> make forthcoming scheduling performance improvements less complicated.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/Preemptor.java 
> ff26c49729646ffe052cb0a993b9984ae96a89ac 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskScheduler.java 
> 6bfa3ac425ed3045fa60d1b0ca547e9bf3cde37a 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/base/Tasks.java 
> a2997f518f90eac34cb6fbb1104240b823d45f22 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/configuration/ConfigurationManager.java
>  8cf845f3622392a65216e0c29084965c7c64075d 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/events/NotifyingSchedulingFilter.java
>  ca53303a675be60300cc1b6534164fa6da7ddbd7 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/filter/ConstraintFilter.java 
> 3839083f27ca5d4b93406152559b58b04e912a10 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/filter/SchedulingFilter.java 
> c1c5f26723f1eac3000e09e061b4582f922fded6 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/filter/SchedulingFilterImpl.java 
> cc6b53b3265253f76c1e954c0108aa5936f5cc36 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/TaskAssigner.java 
> 4abc7ba36c547624af51fabc0983099efe5798ea 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/stats/ResourceCounter.java 
> 79d12b0dd7959b5443ffce43d9ebdb79135718bb 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/PreemptorImplTest.java 
> 8b0367ec99701084ce0cf55229a363c4b0b66b8f 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskSchedulerImplTest.java 
> 9bc6a7535bf69dbc19771aa1834aeb04f42eea48 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskSchedulerTest.java 
> d1bc9bfe987b83356483cf1fb04aef2eb51eb141 
>   
> src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/events/NotifyingSchedulingFilterTest.java
>  94f0a179b786649775899f855f7c1a0caab7290f 
>   
> src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/filter/SchedulingFilterImplTest.java
>  e113eba1f304279b5ee3d70db1d1ea558efd63ac 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/TaskAssignerImplTest.java 
> a8a70b65c6f91371b9afad4dd3806a7c86fba04f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28103/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to