----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28198/#review63040 -----------------------------------------------------------
examples/docker/Dockerfile <https://reviews.apache.org/r/28198/#comment105218> Can we avoid the extra clone here and build from the currently checked out repo? That way this script is likely to stay maintained in the future and might even make it into our development workflow. If that's not possible then as far as I know this sha has no special significance, maybe replace it with a download of the 0.6.0 release? examples/docker/Dockerfile <https://reviews.apache.org/r/28198/#comment105219> Should we also add the upstart configs from the vagrant example to the container? How about documentation for running - can I do something similar to vagrant up and get a full cluster-in-a-box? - Kevin Sweeney On Nov. 25, 2014, 11:47 a.m., Tony Dong wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/28198/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 25, 2014, 11:47 a.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Benjamin Staffin, Kevin Sweeney, and Zameer Manji. > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > ------- > > Add an example on how to build with Docker. > > > Diffs > ----- > > README.md fe46b4f071e1cc8923ac52ea461b66456709eb5d > examples/docker/Dockerfile PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28198/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Tony Dong > >
