-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28198/#review63040
-----------------------------------------------------------



examples/docker/Dockerfile
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28198/#comment105218>

    Can we avoid the extra clone here and build from the currently checked out 
repo? That way this script is likely to stay maintained in the future and might 
even make it into our development workflow.
    
    If that's not possible then as far as I know this sha has no special 
significance, maybe replace it with a download of the 0.6.0 release?



examples/docker/Dockerfile
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28198/#comment105219>

    Should we also add the upstart configs from the vagrant example to the 
container? How about documentation for running - can I do something similar to 
vagrant up and get a full cluster-in-a-box?


- Kevin Sweeney


On Nov. 25, 2014, 11:47 a.m., Tony Dong wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28198/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 25, 2014, 11:47 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Benjamin Staffin, Kevin Sweeney, and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add an example on how to build with Docker.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   README.md fe46b4f071e1cc8923ac52ea461b66456709eb5d 
>   examples/docker/Dockerfile PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28198/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tony Dong
> 
>

Reply via email to