-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31423/#review74620
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Thought this over- the benefits to overall reliability are significant and 
applications should still be motivated to be resilient to the edge case of 'ZK 
registration but application unresponsive'.

Thanks Steve!


src/test/python/apache/aurora/executor/test_thermos_executor.py
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31423/#comment121243>

    good idea


- Joe Smith


On Feb. 26, 2015, 7:20 a.m., Steve Niemitz wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31423/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 26, 2015, 7:20 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Brian Wickman and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Stop the announcer and status checkers before starting to kill the runners.
> 
> This allows the task to be removed from the ZK ensemble before it begins 
> getting killed.  The delay can be significant if the task takes some time to 
> shutdown, and during the time it stops responding to requests.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/executor/aurora_executor.py 
> 9c0282392dbb9cca308baf47adc1750c1f5cacc6 
>   src/test/python/apache/aurora/executor/BUILD 
> 2ee9b1233e9db47455ddccccffbc48691d379222 
>   src/test/python/apache/aurora/executor/test_thermos_executor.py 
> 8dbfb1db5eb7a6548820ff7cf82a9c7092f61d28 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31423/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> We're now running this in our production environments.  Watching ZK, I can 
> confirm that the nodes are removed before process shutdown begins.  Watching 
> the executor log also confirms this.
> 
> I couldn't observe any other side effects either.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Niemitz
> 
>

Reply via email to