-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32171/#review77140
-----------------------------------------------------------


@ReviewBot retry

Forgive me for generating noise, i'm trying to figure out what test case is 
failing...not seeing this locally.  I wasn't able to find the previous run in 
the bot's build history.

- Bill Farner


On March 19, 2015, 10:27 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/32171/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 19, 2015, 10:27 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-1168
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1168
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> NOTE: I also am proposing with this change that the output format of `aurora 
> update list` be line-oriented and more concise (see test changes for 
> examples).  The idea is to follow up ~immediately with AURORA-1206.  The 
> proposal is for this command to let you retrieve update identifiers, and 
> `update status` (whose name may change) will allow you to drill into updates.
> 
> I'm open to input on this.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/update.py 
> f025d46d50592156e2455313890e981722ab63a5 
>   src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/test_supdate.py 
> cb66439a778349fc5add4985a7395655c9e1328a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32171/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to