qqu0127 opened a new pull request, #2325:
URL: https://github.com/apache/helix/pull/2325

   ### Issues
   
   - [ ] My PR addresses the following Helix issues and references them in the 
PR description:
   N.A.
   
   ### Description
   
   - [X] Here are some details about my PR, including screenshots of any UI 
changes:
   
   See also https://github.com/apache/helix/pull/2306
   
   Refactor the zookeeper-api module as preparation for DataChangeListener 
notification implementation in ZkMetaClient.
   A new set of listeners need to be triggered on ZK events, and in order to 
support this, the watcher has to be registered from the new meta-client module. 
We CANNOT reuse ZkClient to implement the new listener interface because it's 
introducing circular dependency.
   
   The change includes:
   1. Accepts `watcher` as param in ZkClient construction, in order to override 
the watcher registration while maintain backward compatibility.
   2. Introduce `boolean connectOnInit`, zkclient was default to connect right 
after class initialization, this is causing trouble in ZkMetaClient 
implementation because the instance might not be fully constructed and causing 
`NullPointerException`. In MetaClient API, `connect` is a standalone method and 
supposed to be invoked separately. 
   3. Marking a few methods and class public to be reused in meta-client module
   4. Fixing some typo and styling.
   
   This PR also enables Helix PR CI for this feature branch to have better 
coverage during development.
   
   ### Tests
   
   - [ ] The following tests are written for this issue:
   
   (List the names of added unit/integration tests)
   
   - The following is the result of the "mvn test" command on the appropriate 
module:
   
   (If CI test fails due to known issue, please specify the issue and test PR 
locally. Then copy & paste the result of "mvn test" to here.)
   
   ### Changes that Break Backward Compatibility (Optional)
   
   - My PR contains changes that break backward compatibility or previous 
assumptions for certain methods or API. They include:
   
   (Consider including all behavior changes for public methods or API. Also 
include these changes in merge description so that other developers are aware 
of these changes. This allows them to make relevant code changes in feature 
branches accounting for the new method/API behavior.)
   
   ### Documentation (Optional)
   
   - In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation in the following 
wiki page:
   
   (Link the GitHub wiki you added)
   
   ### Commits
   
   - My commits all reference appropriate Apache Helix GitHub issues in their 
subject lines. In addition, my commits follow the guidelines from "[How to 
write a good git commit message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)":
     1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
     1. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference)
     1. Subject does not end with a period
     1. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
     1. Body wraps at 72 characters
     1. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"
   
   ### Code Quality
   
   - My diff has been formatted using helix-style.xml 
   (helix-style-intellij.xml if IntelliJ IDE is used)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to