Michael Smith has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/20733 )

Change subject: IMPALA-11805: Use llvm ObjectCache for codegen caching
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(4 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20733/2/be/src/codegen/llvm-codegen-cache-test.cc
File be/src/codegen/llvm-codegen-cache-test.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20733/2/be/src/codegen/llvm-codegen-cache-test.cc@298
PS2, Line 298: void 
LlvmCodeGenCacheTest::TestAtCapacity(TCodeGenCacheMode::type mode) {
> Did a test in both arm and x86. In our testcase of mem_charge_1, the mem ch
Ack


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20733/2/be/src/codegen/llvm-codegen.cc
File be/src/codegen/llvm-codegen.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20733/2/be/src/codegen/llvm-codegen.cc@a1185
PS2, Line 1185: 
> Done
Ack


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20733/2/be/src/codegen/llvm-object-cache-wrapper.h
File be/src/codegen/llvm-object-cache-wrapper.h:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20733/2/be/src/codegen/llvm-object-cache-wrapper.h@44
PS2, Line 44:
> Done
Ack


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20733/2/be/src/codegen/llvm-object-cache-wrapper.cc
File be/src/codegen/llvm-object-cache-wrapper.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20733/2/be/src/codegen/llvm-object-cache-wrapper.cc@66
PS2, Line 66:
> Yeah, this is a good point. Added here.
Ack



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/20733
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic3c1b46bb9018ed0320817141785a3bdc41fa677
Gerrit-Change-Number: 20733
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Yida Wu <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Becker <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Smith <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yida Wu <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 18:45:45 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to