Vuk Ercegovac has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/11539 )

Change subject: IMPALA-7599: make the number of local cache retries configurable
......................................................................


Patch Set 3:

(2 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11539/3//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11539/3//COMMIT_MSG@16
PS3, Line 16:
> May be mention that all other retries (outside of Frontend) will come in a
Done. Note that most of these are from Frontend as well, but there are several 
cases outside as well.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11539/3/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/service/Frontend.java
File fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/service/Frontend.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11539/3/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/service/Frontend.java@1090
PS3, Line 1090: timeline.markEvent(
              :             String.format("Retrying query planning due to 
inconsistent metadata "
              :                     + "fetch, attempt %s of %s: ",
              :                 attempt, INCONSISTENT_METADATA_NUM_RETRIES)
> While we are here, can we move this out of the loop? messes up run-time pro
avoided the repetition by printing a summary to the profile. note that it'll 
only be the last exception that's printed... conceivably, we may fail for a 
variety of reasons but I think its ok to get this level of detail from the logs.



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/11539
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4f14d5a8728f3cb07c7710589c44c2cd52478ba8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 11539
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Vuk Ercegovac <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Bharath Vissapragada <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Vuk Ercegovac <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 23:42:53 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to