Bharath Vissapragada has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/11608 )

Change subject: IMPALA-7597: wraps retries around CatalogMetaProvider
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(12 comments)

Like we discussed offline, I'm wondering if this can be done is any other way 
without a major refactoring of code.  Basically to enforce that the retries are 
done where needed (especially for stuff that can potentially be added in the 
future).  I can't think of any other fancy ways. Todd, do you have any thoughts?

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11608/4/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/service/Frontend.java
File fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/service/Frontend.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11608/4/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/service/Frontend.java@660
PS4, Line 660:    * Keeps track of retries when handling 
InconsistentMetadataFetchExceptions.
Maybe add more context and documentation. In which cases is this used etc. etc.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11608/4/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/service/Frontend.java@666
PS4, Line 666:     private String msg_;
final


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11608/4/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/service/Frontend.java@671
PS4, Line 671:
..of..


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11608/4/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/service/Frontend.java@680
PS4, Line 680:       LOG.warn("Retried {}: {} (retry #{} of {})", msg_, 
exception.getMessage(),
Should any of this bubble up to the runtime profiles (if one exists) for these 
requests?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11608/4/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/service/Frontend.java@681
PS4, Line 681: );
, exception) to log the trace and you can probably skip exception.getMessage()


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11608/4/tests/custom_cluster/test_local_catalog.py
File tests/custom_cluster/test_local_catalog.py:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11608/4/tests/custom_cluster/test_local_catalog.py@173
PS4, Line 173:   def test_cache_metrics(self, unique_database):
did something change here or was it just moved to the top? Kind of confusing in 
the gerrit view.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11608/4/tests/custom_cluster/test_local_catalog.py@218
PS4, Line 218: _find_inconsistent_metadata
name seems confusing. Maybe call check_metadata_fetch_retries or some such 
thing?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11608/4/tests/custom_cluster/test_local_catalog.py@221
PS4, Line 221: ,
mention the randomness part?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11608/4/tests/custom_cluster/test_local_catalog.py@236
PS4, Line 236:       def stress_thread(client):
Add a comment on what this does?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11608/4/tests/custom_cluster/test_local_catalog.py@250
PS4, Line 250:                 inconsistent_seen[0] += 1
catch and record other exceptions since this runs in a thread?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11608/4/tests/custom_cluster/test_local_catalog.py@258
PS4, Line 258: 5
I doubt if this is enough, I noticed some concurrency errors required > 60s


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11608/4/tests/custom_cluster/test_local_catalog.py@280
PS4, Line 280:       "alter table %s.%s set tblproperties ('numRows'='3')" %
Run these on 'functional' tables with a concurrent refresh? That way you can 
probably avoid these unique_db, table_name creation in find_inconsistent_...()



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/11608
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I43a21571d54a7966c5c68bea1fe69dbc62be2a0b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 11608
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Vuk Ercegovac <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Bharath Vissapragada <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tianyi Wang <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Todd Lipcon <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Vuk Ercegovac <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 06:31:48 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to