Aman Sinha has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/16723 )

Change subject: IMPALA-10314: Optimize planning time for simple limits
......................................................................


Patch Set 11:

> Patch Set 11:
>
> (4 comments)
>
> > Patch Set 11:
> >
> > (4 comments)
> >
> > Just a couple corner cases I have run into; given this is an opt-in 
> > optimization now it might not be incorrect to ignore these.
> >
> > I think it's good to think about the case where this optimization helps and 
> > not risk an incorrect limit in other cases. Where this helps most.
> > a. lots of files
> > b. small limits
> >
> > a) the scan range and scheduling overhead is only slow when there are many 
> > hosts + files.
> >
> > b) for large limits maybe the bulk of query run time goes to fetching 
> > results and not the planning, but that said it may not hurt too much in 
> > this case.
>
> Thanks for the comments. I will create a follow-up JIRA to address couple of 
> these comments considering that this CR was +2 ed.
> Note that the more generalized issue of optimizing for limits is something 
> that Tim and I had some offline discussion about and he created 
> 'IMPALA-10347: Explore approaches to optimizing queries that will likely be 
> short-circuited by limits'

Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-10353


--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/16723
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9d6a79263bc092e0f3e9a1d72da5618f3cc35574
Gerrit-Change-Number: 16723
Gerrit-PatchSet: 11
Gerrit-Owner: Aman Sinha <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aman Sinha <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Qifan Chen <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Shant Hovsepian <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tim Armstrong <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 02:37:12 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No

Reply via email to