Sailesh Mukil has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: IMPALA-4880: Clarify synchronization policy for 'done_' in 
KuduScanNode
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(8 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/5494/1//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

Line 7: Clarify synchronization policy for 'done_' in KuduScanNode
> Is there a Jira?
Just added one and updated the JIRA.


PS1, Line 9: calrify
> typo
Done


PS1, Line 9: calrify
> sp
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/5494/1/be/src/exec/kudu-scan-node.cc
File be/src/exec/kudu-scan-node.cc:

Line 217:   unique_lock<mutex> lock(lock_);
> it would be handy for this to return null if done_. I don't think it's stri
Done


PS1, Line 257:     while (!done_) {
> Now that I look at this more, I think this is weird that we check_ done but
Done


PS1, Line 281: done_
> please add a comment that even if this read conflicts with a write to done_
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/5494/1/be/src/exec/kudu-scan-node.h
File be/src/exec/kudu-scan-node.h:

PS1, Line 96: For performance reasons, 
> remove this, it makes it sound like the performance reason _is what makes i
Done


Line 99:   /// contention.
> Does it make sense to add small comments at the particular places, explaini
Yes, I've added it now in the place where it may seem confusing otherwise.


-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/5494
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I72c5f1fecf4bcf737d71a1fa13e59361604485f0
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Sailesh Mukil <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Lars Volker <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Jacobs <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Sailesh Mukil <[email protected]>
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to