MarcosZyk opened a new pull request, #12327:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/12327

   ## Description
   
   
   ### Supported Features
   
   1. create table
   2. describe table
   3. show tables
   
   ### Result
   
   ```
   IoTDB> create database db_1;
   Msg: The statement is executed successfully.
   IoTDB> create table db_1.t_1(device TEXT ID, attr TEXT ATTRIBUTE, time INT64 
TIME, s INT32 MEASUREMENT);
   Msg: The statement is executed successfully.
   IoTDB> use db_1
   Msg: The statement is executed successfully.
   IoTDB> create table t_2(region TEXT ID, code TEXT ID, type TEXT ATTRIBUTE, 
price TEXT ATTRIBUTE, time INT64 TIME, s_1 INT32 MEASUREMENT, s_2 FLOAT 
MEASUREMENT);
   Msg: The statement is executed successfully.
   IoTDB> show tables
   +---------+----+
   |TableName| TTL|
   +---------+----+
   |      t_2|null|
   |      t_1|null|
   +---------+----+
   Total line number = 2
   It costs 0.043s
   IoTDB> describe t_2
   +----------+--------+-----------+
   |ColumnName|DataType|   Category|
   +----------+--------+-----------+
   |    region|    TEXT|         ID|
   |      code|    TEXT|         ID|
   |      type|    TEXT|  ATTRIBUTE|
   |     price|    TEXT|  ATTRIBUTE|
   |      time|   INT64|       TIME|
   |       s_1|   INT32|MEASUREMENT|
   |       s_2|   FLOAT|MEASUREMENT|
   +----------+--------+-----------+
   Total line number = 7
   It costs 0.008s
   IoTDB> describe db_1.t_1
   +----------+--------+-----------+
   |ColumnName|DataType|   Category|
   +----------+--------+-----------+
   |    device|    TEXT|         ID|
   |      attr|    TEXT|  ATTRIBUTE|
   |      time|   INT64|       TIME|
   |         s|   INT32|MEASUREMENT|
   +----------+--------+-----------+
   Total line number = 4
   It costs 0.005s
   
   ```
   
   ### Content3 ...
   
   <!--
   In each section, please describe design decisions made, including:
    - Choice of algorithms
    - Behavioral aspects. What configuration values are acceptable? How are 
corner cases and error 
       conditions handled, such as when there are insufficient resources?
    - Class organization and design (how the logic is split between classes, 
inheritance, composition, 
       design patterns)
    - Method organization and design (how the logic is split between methods, 
parameters and return types)
    - Naming (class, method, API, configuration, HTTP endpoint, names of 
emitted metrics)
   -->
   
   
   <!-- It's good to describe an alternative design (or mention an alternative 
name) for every design 
   (or naming) decision point and compare the alternatives with the designs 
that you've implemented 
   (or the names you've chosen) to highlight the advantages of the chosen 
designs and names. -->
   
   <!-- If there was a discussion of the design of the feature implemented in 
this PR elsewhere 
   (e. g. a "Proposal" issue, any other issue, or a thread in the development 
mailing list), 
   link to that discussion from this PR description and explain what have 
changed in your final design 
   compared to your original proposal or the consensus version in the end of 
the discussion. 
   If something hasn't changed since the original discussion, you can omit a 
detailed discussion of 
   those aspects of the design here, perhaps apart from brief mentioning for 
the sake of readability 
   of this PR description. -->
   
   <!-- Some of the aspects mentioned above may be omitted for simple and small 
changes. -->
   
   <hr>
   
   This PR has:
   - [ ] been self-reviewed.
       - [ ] concurrent read
       - [ ] concurrent write
       - [ ] concurrent read and write 
   - [ ] added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.
   - [ ] added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods. 
   - [ ] added or updated version, __license__, or notice information
   - [ ] added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code 
wherever would not be obvious 
     for an unfamiliar reader.
   - [ ] added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths, 
ensuring the threshold 
     for code coverage.
   - [ ] added integration tests.
   - [ ] been tested in a test IoTDB cluster.
   
   <!-- Check the items by putting "x" in the brackets for the done things. Not 
all of these items 
   apply to every PR. Remove the items which are not done or not relevant to 
the PR. None of the items 
   from the checklist above are strictly necessary, but it would be very 
helpful if you at least 
   self-review the PR. -->
   
   <hr>
   
   ##### Key changed/added classes (or packages if there are too many classes) 
in this PR
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@iotdb.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to