VGalaxies commented on PR #17926:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/17926#issuecomment-4689955918

   CI follow-up:\n\n- Investigated the previous `dual-tree-auto-enhanced (17, 
HighPerformanceMode, HighPerformanceMode, ubuntu-latest, 0)` failure. It failed 
in `IoTDBPipeClusterIT.testRegisteringNewDataNodeAfterTransferringData` with 
inconsistent row counts across DataNodes, which is unrelated to the 
subscription TsFile termination-drain change.\n- Pushed `ddd09219b2` to address 
the Sonar/checkstyle findings on this PR: removed the non-primitive volatile 
field access pattern for `currentTerminateEvent`, fixed the long log line, and 
placed overloaded methods next to each other.\n- Local verification passed:\n  
- `mvn spotless:apply -pl iotdb-core/datanode`\n  - `mvn checkstyle:check -pl 
iotdb-core/datanode`\n  - `mvn verify -DskipUTs 
-Dit.test=org.apache.iotdb.subscription.it.dual.tablemodel.IoTDBSubscriptionTopicIT#testTsFileSnapshotDrainsPendingBatchBeforeTermination
 -DfailIfNoTests=false -Dfailsafe.failIfNoSpecifiedTests=false -pl 
integration-test -am -P MultiClusterIT2Subscriptio
 nTableArchVerification -P with-integration-tests`\n- The new CI run on 
`ddd09219b2` has already passed `SonarCloud Code Analysis` and 
`subscription-table-arch-verification`; the remaining large matrix jobs and 
Codecov are still pending.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to