Mike Percy has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/9627 )

Change subject: WIP: KUDU-2342. consensus: use tighter bound for non-voter 
promotion
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(2 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9627/1//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9627/1//COMMIT_MSG@20
PS1, Line 20: Note: While in consensus_queue.cc I also factored a couple of code
> was it really necessary to combine the refactor and this bug fix/improvemen
The new version is much easier to follow, I think, but you're right that they 
don't have to be the same patch. I think I can quickly split this into two 
patches: one with the refactor and one with the improvements.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9627/1/src/kudu/consensus/consensus_queue.cc
File src/kudu/consensus/consensus_queue.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9627/1/src/kudu/consensus/consensus_queue.cc@959
PS1, Line 959:   if (queue_state_.mode == PeerMessageQueue::LEADER &&
             :       peer->last_exchange_status == PeerStatus::OK) {
> agreed.
That's correct, it's an improvement to the policy. And yes I can do that.



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/9627
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iff517f01d6dc25eb15d01593dd57b7dc0dd25956
Gerrit-Change-Number: 9627
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Mike Percy <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins
Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Percy <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Todd Lipcon <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 22:32:05 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to