Dan Burkert has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/9685 )

Change subject: [docs] Add remaining release notes for 1.7.0
......................................................................


Patch Set 2:

(10 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9685/2/docs/release_notes.adoc
File docs/release_notes.adoc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9685/2/docs/release_notes.adoc@102
PS2, Line 102: target striping
s/target striping/stripe

I think that would be more concise and clearer


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9685/2/docs/release_notes.adoc@109
PS2, Line 109: optional
s/optional//

optional is implied by 'offered'


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9685/2/docs/release_notes.adoc@148
PS2, Line 148: scanLocaliity
s/scanLocaliity/scanLocality


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9685/2/docs/release_notes.adoc@150
PS2, Line 150: A new replica management scheme is implemented and enabled by 
default
this doesn't do a good job of introducing what a 'replica management' scheme 
is, and the name is pretty jargony.  How about something like this:

The strategy Kudu uses for automatically healing tablets which have lost a 
replica due to server or disk failures has been improved.  The new 
re-replication strategy, or replica management scheme, first adds ...


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9685/2/docs/release_notes.adoc@172
PS2, Line 172: improvement
s/improvement/increase

improvement was already used in the sentence.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9685/2/docs/release_notes.adoc@190
PS2, Line 190: were
s/were/is

(or maybe was?) here and at the end of the line


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9685/2/docs/release_notes.adoc@192
PS2, Line 192: would
s/would/could


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9685/2/docs/release_notes.adoc@193
PS2, Line 193: will
s/will//


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9685/2/docs/release_notes.adoc@192
PS2, Line 192:   that previously hosted a replica at that location would be 
unable to contact
             :   that replica, but not evict it
'unable to contact that replica, but not evict it' isn't clear.  Typically you 
don't use two negatives conjoined with 'but'.  Perhaps:

... in some cases, tablet replicas which were previously hosted on the tablet 
server are unable to be evicted from the Raft configuration.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9685/2/docs/release_notes.adoc@194
PS2, Line 194: the one
s/the one//



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/9685
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I1718a2065663245a5bc438288013871566d6941b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 9685
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Grant Henke <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Andrew Wong <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Burkert <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Grant Henke <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Hao Hao <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins
Gerrit-Reviewer: Todd Lipcon <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Will Berkeley <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:56:11 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to