Hao Hao has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/16974 )

Change subject: KUDU-2612: add a TxnSystemClient to the tservers
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(7 comments)

Overall looks good to me, just some nits. Thanks a lot Andrew!

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16974/4//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16974/4//COMMIT_MSG@23
PS4, Line 23: connecting to
nit: connecting to master?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16974/4/src/kudu/rpc/sasl_common.cc
File src/kudu/rpc/sasl_common.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16974/4/src/kudu/rpc/sasl_common.cc@a280
PS4, Line 280:
Why this is disabled? Sorry,I think you briefly mentioned offline, but I didn't 
quite get it.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16974/4/src/kudu/transactions/txn_system_client.cc
File src/kudu/transactions/txn_system_client.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16974/4/src/kudu/transactions/txn_system_client.cc@62
PS4, Line 62: disable_txn_system_client_init
Should it be tagged as hidden as well? Do you expect this to be used outside 
test?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16974/4/src/kudu/transactions/txn_system_client.cc@383
PS4, Line 383: if (PREDICT_FALSE(FLAGS_disable_txn_system_client_init)) {
             :           KLOG_EVERY_N_SECS(WARNING, 60) <<
             :               Substitute("initialization of TxnSystemClient 
disabled, will retry in $0",
             :                          kRetryInterval.ToString());
             :           SleepFor(kRetryInterval);
             :           continue;
             :         }
As we are retrying, do you expect FLAGS_disable_txn_system_client_init to 
change runtime?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16974/4/src/kudu/transactions/txn_system_client.cc@390
PS4, Line 390: // HACK: if the master addresses are all totally unreachable,
             :         // KuduClientBuilder::Build() will hang, attempting 
fruitlessly to
             :         // retry, in the below call to Create(). So first, make 
sure we can at
             :         // least reach the masters; if not, try again.
             :         DnsResolver dns_resolver;
             :         Status s;
             :         for (const auto& hp : master_addrs) {
             :           vector<Sockaddr> addrs;
             :           s = dns_resolver.ResolveAddresses(hp, 
&addrs).AndThen([&] {
             :             unique_ptr<MasterServiceProxy> proxy(
             :                 new MasterServiceProxy(messenger, addrs[0], 
hp.host()));
             :             PingRequestPB req;
             :             PingResponsePB resp;
             :             RpcController rpc;
             :             rpc.set_timeout(MonoDelta::FromSeconds(1));
             :             return proxy->Ping(req, &resp, &rpc);
             :           });
             :           if (s.ok()) {
             :             break;
             :           }
             :         }
I guess the sanitize check is sufficient enough, even later when we actually 
call Create() all masters become unreachable?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16974/4/src/kudu/transactions/txn_system_client.cc@435
PS4, Line 435: txn_client_
Do we want to check(dcheck) txn_client_ is not null here?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16974/4/src/kudu/transactions/txn_system_client.cc@443
PS4, Line 443: Wait
nit: why not Shutdown() after Wait()?



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/16974
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I33b5a2bb5c56ae4bb4b42069af5813e2780fc4bc
Gerrit-Change-Number: 16974
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Andrew Wong <aw...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <aser...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Andrew Wong <aw...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Hao Hao <hao....@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins (120)
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 00:10:01 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to