Alexey Serbin has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/23563 )

Change subject: KUDU-1261 [Java] Add PartialRow.getArrayData()
......................................................................


Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1

(3 comments)

overall looks good to me, just a few nits and questions

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/23563/3/java/kudu-client/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/client/PartialRow.java
File java/kudu-client/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/client/PartialRow.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/23563/3/java/kudu-client/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/client/PartialRow.java@955
PS3, Line 955:   public final Object getArrayData(int columnIndex) {
nit: add the Nullable annotation?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/23563/3/java/kudu-client/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/client/PartialRow.java@956
PS3, Line 956: Type.NESTED
nit: in addition to verifying the type of the column cell, does it make sense 
to check for the proper nested array descriptor?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/23563/3/java/kudu-client/src/test/java/org/apache/kudu/client/TestPartialRow.java
File java/kudu-client/src/test/java/org/apache/kudu/client/TestPartialRow.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/23563/3/java/kudu-client/src/test/java/org/apache/kudu/client/TestPartialRow.java@309
PS3, Line 309: String[] arr = (String[]) 
view.toJavaArray(schema.getColumn("strings"));
Is it possible to unify this across all the various scenarios?  If not, please 
add a comment explaining why the case of String arrays is so special.



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/23563
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I55e7ecfc6876c8aba5f15232d570617ad008f772
Gerrit-Change-Number: 23563
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Abhishek Chennaka <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins (120)
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 01:27:25 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to