-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33919/#review82912
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33919/#comment133743>

    It seems easier if we just use a no-op estimator when oversubscription is 
disabled, rather than special casing it in the slave, no?
    
    Is there not an interplay here between this flag and another flag for which 
estimator to use? Maybe we need one flag? E.g.
    
    ```
    --oversubscription=disable <-- this for disabling
    --oversubscription=conservative
    --oversubscription=bayesian
    --oversubscription=custom
    ```
    
    Did you have something in mind for exposing this?


- Ben Mahler


On May 6, 2015, 10:35 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33919/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 6, 2015, 10:35 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Joris Van Remoortere, Niklas Nielsen, 
> and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2653
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2653
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Integrated resources estimator with the slave.
> 
> This patch hooks the resources estimator with the slave. Slave will simply 
> forward the estimation from the resources estimator to the master.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/Makefile.am 93c7c8a807a33ab639be6289535bbd32022aa85b 
>   src/messages/messages.proto 98d859f3db6013a2e155d838f590a0cde6dc5ed5 
>   src/slave/flags.hpp d3b1ce117fbb4e0b97852ef150b63f35cc991032 
>   src/slave/flags.cpp d0932b04e3825abb6173efe0d1aee199aa356932 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 654a8698be88e0d0f588190775dc3eee6b36f92e 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp c78ee3c9e7fc38ad364e83f4abe267e86bfbbc13 
>   src/tests/oversubscription_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33919/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to