----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34970/#review86767 -----------------------------------------------------------
Bad patch! Reviews applied: [34968, 34969, 34970] Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 34970 Error: 2015-06-05 06:24:06 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/34970/diff/raw/ [16370/16370] -> "34970.patch" [1] error: patch failed: src/examples/no_executor_framework.cpp:16 error: src/examples/no_executor_framework.cpp: patch does not apply Failed to apply patch - Mesos ReviewBot On June 5, 2015, 5:52 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/34970/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 5, 2015, 5:52 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-2655 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2655 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Now the NoExecutorScheduler can take a custom command, as well as the > resources for the task and how many tasks to run. > > This allows us to continue using it for an end-to-end test as part of make > check, but also allows it to be used against a cluster in a long-lived > fashion. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/examples/no_executor_framework.cpp > 37001c389f31f9f1dafe6d7f3eb17adc2e369057 > src/tests/no_executor_framework_test.sh > d2d395595b778bc543e1baaa0fd415dc622b647f > src/tests/script.cpp 515e3141e1d517da4cfc1421d5301d0a3bd6ad51 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34970/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > The existing no executor framework test picks this up. > > Since we do not have an non-zero estimator yet, I modified the slave to send > revocable resources in order to manually test the revocable case. > > > Thanks, > > Ben Mahler > >
