> On June 20, 2015, 7:35 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/hashmap.hpp, line 52
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/35694/diff/3/?file=988938#file988938line52>
> >
> >     Let's avoid re-creating iterator:
> >     
> >     ```
> >     for (auto iterator = map.begin(), auto endIterator = map.end();
> >          iterator != endIterator;
> >          ++iterator) {
> >     ```
> 
> Till Toenshoff wrote:
>     We never really do this kind of optimzation within mesos, or do we? I 
> briefly checked a couple of stout-files which dont try to avoid re-getting 
> the end of a list.
>     
>     Given that it does not increase readability, I'ld  suggest to first check 
> if this really was a serious gainer (some neat little profiling) and if so, 
> adapt our styleguide.

It does not reduce readability either, why not gaining free performance then?

And actually legal precedent is set: `slave.cpp:1262`, commit 
ccf6c254a1620e512ec66f1e20644d47c12c6832


- Alexander


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35694/#review88661
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 20, 2015, 7:18 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/35694/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 20, 2015, 7:18 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2832
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2832
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/hashmap.hpp 
> 4f90d3dcd880b95f22ea13c56a61c7f981eea57d 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/hashmap_tests.cpp 
> 6a26d93a9a68ab18b7c9b25039a96b663a73a309 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35694/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>

Reply via email to