> On June 23, 2015, 3:01 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/linux_launcher.hpp, line 33
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/35586/diff/5/?file=990176#file990176line33>
> >
> >     I think fo LinuxLauncher, we can just use 'int namespaces' (no need to 
> > use Option).

Using a plain 'int' makes the call sites a bit harder in isolator_tests and 
port-mapping tests where we would then have to check whether the corresponding 
isolator returns a None() or not before calling into `LinuxLauncher::create`. 
If there is a strong preference, I can change it, otherwise, let's leave it as 
is.


- Kapil


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35586/#review89025
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 23, 2015, 3:05 p.m., Kapil Arya wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/35586/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 23, 2015, 3:05 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ian Downes, Jie Yu, and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2884
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2884
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> MesosContainerizer looks up the list of required namespaces by calling
> Isolator::namespaces() for all enabled isolators and passes on this
> value to LinuxLauncher.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/linux_launcher.hpp 
> ec08e24b9ba525893d218636ebddea480e641bbf 
>   src/slave/containerizer/linux_launcher.cpp 
> 8eae258d81229e19f8c587f5e023b1df7deed025 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
> 8c102fb7d1f79ee768cb06de3a976ea12f958712 
>   src/tests/isolator_tests.cpp c635a4d5c78d71ca5474993eba57d1f81be9cbf1 
>   src/tests/port_mapping_tests.cpp 6caab134fdbf3894f9fae801daf9491a13888c7d 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35586/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kapil Arya
> 
>

Reply via email to