> On June 25, 2015, 5:20 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote: > > src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp, line 233 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/35836/diff/2/?file=991617#file991617line233> > > > > For posterity, can you add a comment here on why we store "allocated" > > in the allocator despite having that information in the sorter?
Done. - Jie ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35836/#review89385 ----------------------------------------------------------- On June 24, 2015, 9:53 p.m., Jie Yu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/35836/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 24, 2015, 9:53 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-2919 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2919 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Replaced slave's 'available' with 'allocated' in hierarchical allocator. > > This is used to fix MESOS-2919. See ticket for details and motivation. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp > ef18ff850addfb5ce3500ed28e8ffd801e2d24eb > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35836/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Jie Yu > >
