> On July 6, 2015, 5:25 a.m., Adam B wrote:
> > docs/attributes-resources.md, line 31
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/36173/diff/1/?file=999015#file999015line31>
> >
> >     No sets? Or are attributes implicitly sets?

I was suprised when I read the source code too, but we actually explicitly 
don't support sets for attributes yet.


> On July 6, 2015, 5:25 a.m., Adam B wrote:
> > docs/attributes-resources.md, line 39
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/36173/diff/1/?file=999015#file999015line39>
> >
> >     3 types? What about plain text?

Plain text is not a supported resource type. Not sure why but that's what the 
parse code looks like.


- Timothy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36173/#review90437
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 3, 2015, 9:30 p.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36173/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 3, 2015, 9:30 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin Hindman, Bernd Mathiske, and Till 
> Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Update attributes doc to reflect current supported attributes types.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/attributes-resources.md 0ae8b5908fe0b3a3499e6d813afbb328a13bdcde 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36173/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Timothy Chen
> 
>

Reply via email to