> On July 5, 2015, 8:02 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> >
> 
> Joris Van Remoortere wrote:
>     Hey Ben,
>     Great questions in the latter half of your review.
>     It turns out that the original test was malformed. It happened to pass 
> because there is also a help process that responds to the `/help` endpoint.
>     The original intent of the test, however, was to ensure that the newly 
> added `/help` endpoint would work. That newly added enpoint was actually 
> never being hit.
>     
>     The name is being passed through to the HTTPProcess constructor 
> explicitly to make the url at which the test endpoint is being hit stable. If 
> the default `Process` constructor is used, then we end up using the 
> auto-incrementing ids which can be hard to deterministically hit.
>     
>     I agree that we should stick with a single endpoint as you suggested; 
> however, we need to change the name to something unique to avoid this test 
> from passing accidentally when the intended path is broken.
>     
>     We definitely need a comment as to why we're explicitly specifying the 
> name of the process (as described above). I have seen a couple of people bang 
> their heads against this, so let's add cleared documentation to the headers / 
> doxygen as well!

Ben suggested to use MOCK_METHOD/EXPECT_CALL to make sure that the right 
callback is being invoked. As for the named processes, Ben suggested to use 
process.self().id instead of having named processes.


- Artem


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35755/#review90423
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 6, 2015, 9:03 a.m., Artem Harutyunyan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/35755/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 6, 2015, 9:03 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Joris Van Remoortere.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2862
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2862
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fixes MESOS-2862
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/launcher/fetcher.cpp 8aee4901ec1289f43b5fa6b830c3488815ec24cd 
>   src/tests/fetcher_tests.cpp ae10c420f7dddb8650377c91b5343591e8560392 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35755/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> - make check 
> - added a test case for fetcher
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Artem Harutyunyan
> 
>

Reply via email to