> On July 10, 2015, 3:11 a.m., Chi Zhang wrote:
> > src/linux/perf.cpp, line 449
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/36378/diff/1/?file=1004593#file1004593line449>
> >
> >     Using Try as a function parameter feels a bit non-idiomatic to me, 
> > though I agree it's less code this way.

In other places I would agree with you, but in this case we should be able to 
test for os::release returning an error so the Try makes sense.


> On July 10, 2015, 3:11 a.m., Chi Zhang wrote:
> > src/linux/perf.cpp, lines 476-483
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/36378/diff/1/?file=1004593#file1004593line476>
> >
> >     I think using a hashmap as an intermediate type is more flexisible.
> >     
> >     Right now, the operation after 'extract' is the same for all versions, 
> > but we can make it version-dependent too in the future to support e.g. 
> > unit, running time, etc.

Disagree.  The Sample struct is local to this file, so it is very easy to 
change.  Using a hashmap introduces the possibility for runtime errors which 
are caught at compile time this way.


> On July 10, 2015, 3:11 a.m., Chi Zhang wrote:
> > src/linux/perf.cpp, lines 462-474
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/36378/diff/1/?file=1004593#file1004593line462>
> >
> >     This is great abstraction; I agree we should put it into stout. (maybe 
> > even have os::release just return canonicalized linux version?)

I will raise this as a separate ticket. Making os::release return the 
canonicalized linux version introduces the potential confusion that uname would 
no longer match os::release.


- Paul


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36378/#review91262
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 9, 2015, 11:08 p.m., Paul Brett wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36378/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 9, 2015, 11:08 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Chi Zhang, Ian Downes, and Cong Wang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2834
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2834
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Refactor Linux Performance monitor to handle changing 'perf stat' output 
> versions depending on kernel version.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/linux/perf.cpp 697b75e846a43d4f106ad8f39a18882836d7dc02 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36378/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul Brett
> 
>

Reply via email to