> On July 22, 2015, 4:35 a.m., Artem Harutyunyan wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/gate.hpp, line 18
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/36673/diff/1/?file=1018363#file1018363line18>
> >
> >     Is this todo still valid?

Sort of. Although it is true that std::mutex is implemented using futex, you 
could in theory directly implement on them?
Ben, what do you think?


- Joris


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36673/#review92538
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 22, 2015, 4:07 a.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36673/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 22, 2015, 4:07 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3119
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3119
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/once.hpp 
> 7d0d9309a41a8cc7c074b7566b7b9c411fa8ad45 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/gate.hpp 7f6b3d8ddc823f637afcf6dc81b8371e4a794a0b 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36673/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check in libprocess.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joris Van Remoortere
> 
>

Reply via email to