> On July 22, 2015, 4:35 a.m., Artem Harutyunyan wrote: > > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/gate.hpp, line 18 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/36673/diff/1/?file=1018363#file1018363line18> > > > > Is this todo still valid? > > Joris Van Remoortere wrote: > Sort of. Although it is true that std::mutex is implemented using futex, > you could in theory directly implement on them? > Ben, what do you think?
We can kill this TODO. ;-) I think it's from 2008 (pre Mesos). - Benjamin ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36673/#review92538 ----------------------------------------------------------- On July 22, 2015, 4:07 a.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/36673/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 22, 2015, 4:07 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Michael Park. > > > Bugs: MESOS-3119 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3119 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/once.hpp > 7d0d9309a41a8cc7c074b7566b7b9c411fa8ad45 > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/gate.hpp 7f6b3d8ddc823f637afcf6dc81b8371e4a794a0b > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36673/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check in libprocess. > > > Thanks, > > Joris Van Remoortere > >
