> On Aug. 1, 2015, 12:22 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > configure.ac, lines 1560-1561
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/36842/diff/2/?file=1026427#file1026427line1560>
> >
> >     Hm.. coming across this I can't tell how this works, mind adding a 
> > comment?
> >     
> >     The following seems like magic:
> >     
> >     ```
> >     inline Try<Nothing> cloexec(int fd)
> >     {
> >       UNIMPLEMENTED; // what is this symbol? can't find it
> >     }
> >     ```

Ah, sorry I was looking at UNIMPLEMENTED in some of the committed os.hpp code 
before unimplemented.hpp was committed, I guess the commit order was wrong?

Anyway, perhaps having a pointer to stout's unimplemented.hpp would be nice in 
the configure.ac code.


- Ben


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36842/#review93823
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 31, 2015, 9:54 p.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36842/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 31, 2015, 9:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Artem Harutyunyan, Joseph Wu, and 
> Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3122
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3122
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> use --enable-static-unimplemented to get compile time errors as opposed
> to runtime errors.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configure.ac 546c9bbf775a4ef481fafb3a58c85c6d80e19500 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36842/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> created a function with an `UNIMPLEMENTED()` body and verified the runtime 
> error occured when configured by default, and a compile-time error ocurred 
> when configured with `--enable-static-unimplemented`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joris Van Remoortere
> 
>

Reply via email to