-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37417/#review95806
-----------------------------------------------------------


Did you still want to use 'Perf' here? If not, I can't tell what we're gaining 
in this change, does supported() provide additional validation?

- Ben Mahler


On Aug. 18, 2015, 11:01 p.m., Paul Brett wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/37417/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 18, 2015, 11:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3185
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3185
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Convert Perf event validator to use new shared object.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/linux/perf.cpp cdc5f8314a875ababf2b17a32873775d808e1c78 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37417/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul Brett
> 
>

Reply via email to