-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37500/#review96478
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/master/master.cpp (line 1920)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/37500/#comment151874>

    I think that the logic in 
    void Master::_subscribe(
        const UPID& from,
        const scheduler::Call::Subscribe& subscribe,
        const Future<bool>& authorized)
    should also be udpated?


- Guangya Liu


On Aug. 25, 2015, 8:25 p.m., Aditi Dixit wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/37500/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 25, 2015, 8:25 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3240
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3240
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added user to master's state, slave's state (not exposed) and updated user in 
> all slaves that have the registered framework. Added the test too.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/http.cpp 37d76ee72f6a037f551bf2609e9393e16b496e44 
>   src/master/master.hpp 36c67599ef2c470da8d95f2caf926a154342d2cc 
>   src/master/master.cpp 95207d24db0aa052eb70c4cc7eb75d0611c365cf 
>   src/messages/messages.proto 8977d8e0f3b16003128b6b9cab556a7b224f083c 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 09172f7ed547049b3bd169b3db9be94e14f6bc39 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 2a99abc00c525a93508d38e74d351d2f36572d86 
>   src/tests/fault_tolerance_tests.cpp 
> 89cb18be96cd60fb77fbcc4acd08cebdcf1ba075 
>   src/tests/master_tests.cpp 8a6b98b9f59ead20f537eb60b5084feed069a5b1 
>   src/tests/slave_recovery_tests.cpp e1392a2235ff51dac7a3cb7cd3e8edf8406864fc 
>   src/tests/slave_tests.cpp d55e9dd4f4eb84a8fda85439e31a38e70890b377 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37500/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aditi Dixit
> 
>

Reply via email to