> On Aug. 26, 2015, 11 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote: > > Do you plan to migrate existing protobufs to `TimeSpec` or use it for new > > protobufs only?
For now, the plan is to have new protobufs use it. And we can change existing protobufs to use it, if they benefit from having integer time. - Joseph ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37655/#review96638 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Aug. 26, 2015, 3:56 p.m., Joseph Wu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/37655/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 26, 2015, 3:56 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Bernd Mathiske, Ben Mahler, Artem > Harutyunyan, Joris Van Remoortere, and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-3299 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3299 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Instead of using doubles, seconds and nanoseconds can be represented like > `struct timespec`, with one field for seconds and one for nanoseconds. > > This will be important if frameworks need to compare times to make decisions > (such as for maintenance primitives). > > Note about the naming: > > * Time will conflict with the Time class. > * Most denominations of time (Seconds, Minutes, Hours, etc) will conflict > with Duration. > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/mesos.proto 33e1b28f1ccbe227657a14395f81df20e0a9e193 > include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto 382b978dca769757171c5558b7f259870592c321 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37655/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > `make check` > > > Thanks, > > Joseph Wu > >
