> On Aug. 30, 2015, 5:10 p.m., Robert Lacroix wrote:
> > src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp, line 153
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/37873/diff/3/?file=1059860#file1059860line153>
> >
> >     Are we quiescing resources or rather offers? I think it should be 
> > called `quiesceOffers` so it's symmetrical to `reviveOffers`.

Technically, allocator does not know anything about offers, only about 
allocations. This may change soon (we think about pulling offers management 
into allocator), but until then I find this naming misleading.


- Alexander


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37873/#review97031
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 31, 2015, 5:49 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/37873/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 31, 2015, 5:49 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Jie Yu, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3037
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3037
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add quiesce logic in allocator
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/master/allocator.hpp 659f37b3f9d9fa02da9bdb6c85cd3c180a24b73a 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/allocator.hpp 
> aa55755a9c3250579e9366bdbc17a2449e95d659 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp 
> 38f8fd2c84314bb3731684d0e9795cb4f50a227e 
>   src/master/master.cpp 95207d24db0aa052eb70c4cc7eb75d0611c365cf 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp b2160f50db3e0b0d04b0625e7589004016c0f746 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37873/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guangya Liu
> 
>

Reply via email to