> On Sept. 7, 2015, 9:24 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > src/common/values.cpp, lines 277-278
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38158/diff/2/?file=1064869#file1064869line277>
> >
> >     Since you're editing here, mind explaining what an "urange" is?

As the comment above states it is an Un-coalesced range, will try to highlight 
that more.


> On Sept. 7, 2015, 9:24 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > src/common/values.cpp, line 665
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38158/diff/2/?file=1064869#file1064869line665>
> >
> >     Just to make sure, you have added just `2` lines to this function (not 
> > easy on RB):
> >     ```
> >           sort(ranges);
> >           coalesce(ranges);
> >     ```
> >     Correct?

And removed one temporary Ranges object (see line 72 in previous version).


> On Sept. 7, 2015, 9:24 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > src/common/values.cpp, lines 442-444
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38158/diff/2/?file=1064869#file1064869line442>
> >
> >     Let's let compiler do it's job: how about passing `left` by value and 
> > not creating a copy manually?

Wanted to keep the (internal) interface consistent with the other operators. Do 
you have a strong preference here?


> On Sept. 7, 2015, 9:24 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > src/common/values.cpp, lines 185-186
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38158/diff/2/?file=1064869#file1064869line185>
> >
> >     s/is/are
> >     
> >     I would suggest we write high level comments. How about this: "We 
> > assume ranges are sorted in ascending order of the lower endpoint."

ranges is the Ranges object i.e. is, and otherwise I personally find 
range.begin() a more precise description....


- Joerg


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38158/#review97937
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 7, 2015, 6:04 p.m., Joerg Schad wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38158/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 7, 2015, 6:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Bernd Mathiske and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3051
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3051
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The goal of this refactoring was to reuse the Ranges objects as much as 
> possible, as prior there was substantial time spend in allocation/destruction 
> (MESOS-3051).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/values.hpp e300580431f7fd6cff06e9617c0227b51c4cb8e2 
>   src/common/values.cpp 750264e603b4cde2011f07f4434a4b34fe3e512f 
>   src/tests/resources_tests.cpp 2ae93a9c8235e5e4643539d409df51c39c6d7e56 
>   src/tests/values_tests.cpp fc35d97894a2de6207b9337180e2160e6f2cb1f5 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38158/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joerg Schad
> 
>

Reply via email to