> On Sept. 14, 2015, 6:11 p.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote: > > src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/docker/registry_client.cpp, line 266 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38289/diff/2/?file=1068777#file1068777line266> > > > > Not yours , but can we just do OK().status ?
never understood the reasoning behind the construct. "OK().status" . I could imagine a const static like Http::OK_STATUS OR a response.isOk(). "OK().status" makes you create a new struct and then do a string comparision. We already have a response object and we should be asing it if it is an OK. - Jojy ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38289/#review98876 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Sept. 11, 2015, 7:34 p.m., Timothy Chen wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/38289/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 11, 2015, 7:34 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Jojy Varghese. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Handle bad request in Docker registry client. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/Makefile.am 8963cea9fd7e3bee450a1059e6383e5ab868a17b > src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/docker/registry_client.hpp > PRE-CREATION > src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/docker/registry_client.cpp > PRE-CREATION > src/tests/provisioners/docker_provisioner_tests.cpp > ff29d562c7f1bd5f0579e97cdbd60c2b2f36329e > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38289/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Timothy Chen > >
