> On Sept. 17, 2015, 9:42 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/tests/mesos.hpp, line 1608
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/37873/diff/8/?file=1074999#file1074999line1608>
> >
> >     Needs a test for the scheduler driver. I've only see one for the http 
> > scheduler library.
> >     
> >     Also, can you send a review for CHANGELOG and upgrades.md updates for 
> > 0.25.0? feel free to send that after this chain gets committed, to avoid 
> > making this chain even bigger.
> 
> Guangya Liu wrote:
>     Vinod, I see that the CHANGELOG is now using 0.24.1 in release notes, so 
> I need to udpate QuiesceOffer to 0.24.1 CHANGELOG? Thanks.

No. Create a new CHANGELOG for 0.25.0 (WIP).


- Vinod


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37873/#review99450
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 18, 2015, 3:55 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/37873/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 18, 2015, 3:55 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Ben Mahler, Jie Yu, and Vinod 
> Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3037
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3037
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add quiesce logic in allocator
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/master/allocator.hpp fb09e2a6502bc8c78ddcc8a595bcd9320da136ea 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/allocator.hpp 
> 171548b2017a0b97124f052c21345668e274d117 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp 
> 3374d63b8311cf10b3108f56b7b167c12a9d7a37 
>   src/master/master.cpp 1c4e7af7448c05f54c1068d6496ed21c8c359ac5 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp 3db97aca921c9216d90384e1eb17030849516454 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37873/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guangya Liu
> 
>

Reply via email to