> On Sept. 29, 2015, 9:04 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> > src/tests/containerizer/filesystem_isolator_tests.cpp, lines 926-930
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38858/diff/2/?file=1087335#file1087335line926>
> >
> >     This doesn't verify the work_dir *is* bind mounted, just that *if* it 
> > is then it's a shared mount...

We don't care if it is a bind mount or not. As long as its a shared mount in 
its own peer group, we are ok with that.


- Jie


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38858/#review101011
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 29, 2015, 7:48 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38858/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 29, 2015, 7:48 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Timothy Chen and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3539
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3539
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Ensured that slave's work_dir is a shared mount in its own peer group when 
> LinuxFilesystemIsolator is used.
> 
> This addressed the TODO in the current code.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/filesystem/linux.cpp 
> 8fa929f12838044762be82287e1b71440cccc6d9 
>   src/tests/containerizer/filesystem_isolator_tests.cpp 
> 41d098c7d66eba0befc3708c6660a6a3e5f0d2de 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38858/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to