-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39559/#review103636
-----------------------------------------------------------



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/windows/mkdtemp.hpp (line 
31)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39559/#comment161696>

    Just so I catch it before it comes up: this is new code that needs to be 
tested, but we wrote it so that we could pull the FS tests out of `os_test.hpp`.
    
    So my brief answer to "yo, are you stupid, you can't commit this stuff with 
tests" is "yes, I agree, but I have to write this before we can open up the 
tests!" :)


- Alex Clemmer


On Oct. 22, 2015, 6:23 p.m., Alex Clemmer wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39559/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 22, 2015, 6:23 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Artem Harutyunyan, Joris Van Remoortere, and Joseph 
> Wu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Windows: Implemented `os::mkdtemp`.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/Makefile.am 
> ba2836a72ceee948cb43364e80ada9f132f33d04 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os.hpp 
> 7f70c9ea7d57634b5bfd40523ba37561ec92a09a 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/mkdtemp.hpp 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/posix/mkdtemp.hpp 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/windows/mkdtemp.hpp 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp 
> b6afe0e76366d0bc68d37097ced83a1e14828d84 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/windows/os.hpp 
> 3e6f2aafd0f541f512025dfa683ab4178701f7c4 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39559/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex Clemmer
> 
>

Reply via email to