-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38874/#review103723
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Thanks for the patience and for reworking the patches!

I think the CHECK_SOME in Executor::send is problematic, see below. I made some 
adjustments based on my comments in the review, please have a look over the 
commit diff!


src/slave/slave.hpp (line 637)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38874/#comment161793>

    Doesn't look like this should be a CHECK_SOME given the possibility of both 
being None, mind just logging a warning when we drop the message instead of the 
CHECK_SOME?



src/slave/slave.hpp (line 685)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38874/#comment161794>

    How about s/Unknown/Not known yet/ to suggest that we find out later?



src/slave/slave.hpp 
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38874/#comment161795>

    Hm.. doesn't this still need to be in the header? How do the output 
operations in Executor above compile?



src/slave/slave.cpp (line 4114)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38874/#comment161796>

    It looks like this call can trip the CHECK_SOME in Executor::send? :(



src/slave/slave.cpp (line 5399)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38874/#comment161797>

    The "at IP:PORT" should be sufficient, no need to say of type PID.



src/slave/slave.cpp (line 5404)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38874/#comment161799>

    how about "(via HTTP)"



src/slave/slave.cpp (line 5406)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38874/#comment161798>

    I think this will come out confusing in the logs, if I just read "of type: 
Unknown" it's not clear what the meaning of type is here. Would suggest saying 
nothing here.


- Ben Mahler


On Oct. 23, 2015, 1:34 a.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38874/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 23, 2015, 1:34 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Isabel Jimenez, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3480
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3480
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This change refactors the Executor struct on Agent and adds support for 
> Executors to connect via the `api/v1/executor` endpoint on Agent. This is 
> similar to the change done in Master for the Scheduler HTTP API.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp d81a9c4d09d3f6be417120e412324258f19604a3 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp e9f2d1bf7978450f0cd471bdb5606305092fc98a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38874/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anand Mazumdar
> 
>

Reply via email to