> On Nov. 3, 2015, 8:06 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/upgrades.md, line 16
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39908/diff/2/?file=1114943#file1114943line16>
> >
> >     this should also be mentioned in the CHANGELOG.

The CHANGELOG will be created by the release managers for 0.26.0 (Bernd and 
Till) right? I understand we'll want to make sure this is included in the 
CHANGELOG for 0.26.0 once it is introduced. Do you think we need to block this 
patch for it?


- Michael


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39908/#review104967
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 3, 2015, 7:52 p.m., Isabel Jimenez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39908/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 3, 2015, 7:52 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3560
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3560
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added mention to Credential protobuf change in 0.26 in uprades.md
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/upgrades.md 3854e59 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39908/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Isabel Jimenez
> 
>

Reply via email to