-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38579/#review105352
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/registry_client.cpp (line 276)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38579/#comment163908>

    Remove redundant check from above.



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/registry_client.cpp (line 291)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38579/#comment163909>

    None of our onXXXXX callbacks with futures should return anything, since it 
has no effect!
    
    Just remove this onDiscard if you're not really doing anything here.



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/registry_client.cpp (line 445)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38579/#comment163910>

    Can you use the new .status == http::Status::OK and simliar checks here?


- Timothy Chen


On Nov. 5, 2015, 7:17 p.m., Jojy Varghese wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38579/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 5, 2015, 7:17 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> - Cleanup and broke big methods into smaller chunks.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/registry_client.hpp 
> ad57d8592c5f9df5115b575855ed2e99a0597359 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/registry_client.cpp 
> e4d2c22cf6627c1c76ebafeeb84b2bbf6b8c238c 
>   src/tests/containerizer/provisioner_docker_tests.cpp 
> 8d90894410cd834edf49a2814d1b616718798fe8 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38579/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jojy Varghese
> 
>

Reply via email to