> On Nov. 13, 2015, 11:04 a.m., Neil Conway wrote: > > This patch should also have updated v1/mesos.proto, I'd think?
Because I found we have some inconsistents between mesos.proto and v1/mesos.proto. Should we update v1/mesos.proto? - haosdent ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37022/#review106398 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 7, 2015, 7:15 a.m., haosdent huang wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/37022/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 7, 2015, 7:15 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Adam B, Christos Kozyrakis, and Michael Park. > > > Bugs: MESOS-2960 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2960 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Allow Visibility per port in DiscoveryInfo. > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/mesos.proto 1b36e66ded4be8cbe98b751a0816db54be70ad69 > src/common/type_utils.cpp 0e11468375af384e1ba4bf9a4e16720db5afeb63 > src/tests/master_tests.cpp 856440559de7d58be5bcf2ab6be911b5c67001cd > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37022/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > haosdent huang > >
