> On Nov. 13, 2015, 11:04 a.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> > This patch should also have updated v1/mesos.proto, I'd think?

Because I found we have some inconsistents between mesos.proto and 
v1/mesos.proto. Should we update v1/mesos.proto?


- haosdent


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37022/#review106398
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 7, 2015, 7:15 a.m., haosdent huang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/37022/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 7, 2015, 7:15 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Christos Kozyrakis, and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2960
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2960
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Allow Visibility per port in DiscoveryInfo.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 1b36e66ded4be8cbe98b751a0816db54be70ad69 
>   src/common/type_utils.cpp 0e11468375af384e1ba4bf9a4e16720db5afeb63 
>   src/tests/master_tests.cpp 856440559de7d58be5bcf2ab6be911b5c67001cd 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37022/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> haosdent huang
> 
>

Reply via email to