> On 十一月 19, 2015, 3:14 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> > docs/persistent-volume.md, line 258
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/40247/diff/3/?file=1129381#file1129381line258>
> >
> >     I think that the http endpoint should also works without autherization, 
> > for such case, the principal and password are not needed.
> 
> Neil Conway wrote:
>     I opened MESOS-3987 for this.

Thanks for filing this ticket!


- Guangya


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40247/#review107121
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 十一月 23, 2015, 11:44 a.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/40247/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 十一月 23, 2015, 11:44 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Greg Mann and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2455
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2455
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added HTTP endpoints for creating and destroying persistent volumes.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/persistent-volume.md 0951ccb69daaa19b959e11cf3bf972a674a58305 
>   docs/reservation.md 81f21c3755b216b0932876c1ddd9de4d3fbe814a 
>   src/Makefile.am 8d14ff803249b5b81b696d40d37e013960dee41b 
>   src/master/http.cpp 1c4f1406f5d917f5d655a7d61d311365f8999ce0 
>   src/master/master.hpp d4b1edde98925fd51e056f253758afea779be9ed 
>   src/master/master.cpp d2bc83cd77ae7fe723ccb35a7c1e0b70a04a0d6e 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp b3f69ccb9870b17a335a2fe7dbf2802c1b709e6b 
>   src/tests/persistent_volume_endpoints_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40247/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> (1) make check, including newly added tests
> 
> (2) Manually created/removed persistent volumes via HTTP endpoints + curl.
> 
> (3) Previewed docs in Github gist.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>

Reply via email to