-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38253/#review109207
-----------------------------------------------------------



include/mesos/mesos.proto (line 821)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38253/#comment168684>

    We missed to update the V1 API with this change, it seems.


- Till Toenshoff


On Sept. 17, 2015, 5:41 p.m., Klaus Ma wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38253/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 17, 2015, 5:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2875
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2875
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> We should ensure that we are addressing the container which the QoS 
> controller intended to kill. Without this check, we may run into a scenario 
> where the executor has terminated and one with the same id has started in the 
> interim i.e. running in a different container than the one the QoS controller 
> targeted.
> 
> This most likely requires us to add containerId to the ResourceUsage message 
> and encode the containerID in the QoS Correction message.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 899d52f 
>   include/mesos/slave/oversubscription.proto fa69a95 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 93353a1 
>   src/tests/oversubscription_tests.cpp 0c5edaf 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38253/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Klaus Ma
> 
>

Reply via email to