-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40944/#review111726
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!


src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/spec.cpp (line 117)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/40944/#comment171957>

    We should elaborate more here: "Failed to parse v1Compatbility json: "......



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/spec.cpp (line 125)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/40944/#comment171956>

    I would make the error message more exact (Parsing v1Compatibility protobuf 
failed:....).



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/spec.cpp (line 129)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/40944/#comment171958>

    We never expect this to happen right? Let's make this a CHECK instead since 
this is a programming error not a user input error.


- Timothy Chen


On Dec. 20, 2015, 1:43 a.m., Gilbert Song wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/40944/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 20, 2015, 1:43 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Artem Harutyunyan, Jojy Varghese, and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fixed protobuf parse failure when pulling a docker image.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/registry_puller.cpp 
> 7cdb15b9529eab82867b3470a016bb8ad09ff250 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/spec.cpp 
> 5bbd98cb1c5f3aefd9050859d066b43360e6eb75 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/v2.proto 
> fdf159d003f8e5718de0f4d8bf9a2b1374cc11a2 
>   src/tests/containerizer/provisioner_docker_tests.cpp 
> 7c1197ed03df8b5d77d26307560535f9ff5bf350 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40944/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check(ubuntu14.04 + clang3.6)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gilbert Song
> 
>

Reply via email to