> On Dec. 27, 2015, 2:39 p.m., Joerg Schad wrote:
> > docs/containerizer.md, line 30
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41657/diff/2/?file=1174788#file1174788line30>
> >
> >     container technologies? Maybe something like: Mesos currently supports 
> > the following containerizer?

Since this document is user facing ,for someone who is trying to undertand how 
mesos and containers play together. The intended audience most likely would be 
familiar with words like "containers" but not with "containerizers"(which is a 
mesos terminology). So the intent here is to use words that the intended 
audience of this document is familiar with. Maybe its conveying wrong 
information? Would love to get ur feedback.


- Jojy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41657/#review111927
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 22, 2015, 10:27 p.m., Jojy Varghese wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41657/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 22, 2015, 10:27 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Joerg Schad.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This documentation is intended for users trying to get an overview of
> containerizer technology. It also provides the criteria for selecting a
> particular type of containerizer.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/containerizer.md PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/home.md 51c19bb9d0d74698fcdda6197d32ed8f4a57d7c9 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41657/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> mesos website docker.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jojy Varghese
> 
>

Reply via email to