> On Dec. 29, 2015, 9:46 a.m., Joerg Schad wrote:
> > docs/containerizer.md, line 9
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41657/diff/4/?file=1177017#file1177017line9>
> >
> >     I thought about this a little more (not this is not an issue just an 
> > idea so feel free to ignore), maybe it makes sense to focus on the 
> > Motivation (instead of defining what containerizers are)
> >     
> >     How do you feel about the following.
> >     
> >     # Motivation
> >     
> >     As Mesos is able of running a large number of tasks it needs to ensure 
> > the following:
> >     
> >     * Isolate tasks ....
> >     * .....
> >     * ....
> >     * ......
> >     
> >     In order to achieve this Mesos run tasks in 'containers' which in turn 
> > can be controlled by different containerizers.

Not sure if the motivation of containers/containerizer is the scale of tasks.


> On Dec. 29, 2015, 9:46 a.m., Joerg Schad wrote:
> > docs/containerizer.md, line 12
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41657/diff/4/?file=1177017#file1177017line12>
> >
> >     s/a task/ tasks?

"A container" isolates "a task" from the rest of tasks.


> On Dec. 29, 2015, 9:46 a.m., Joerg Schad wrote:
> > docs/containerizer.md, line 16
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41657/diff/4/?file=1177017#file1177017line16>
> >
> >     with same environment you mean the tasks environment (e.g., provided by 
> > the docker container), which can then be run across different environments 
> > (e.g., dev, production, testing)?
> >     
> >     In that case the term 'same environment' seems a little misleading.

This was inspired from Docker's website which says ```This guarantees that it 
will always run the same, regardless of the environment it is running in```


- Jojy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41657/#review112139
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 28, 2015, 8:23 p.m., Jojy Varghese wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41657/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 28, 2015, 8:23 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Joerg Schad.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This documentation is intended for users trying to get an overview of
> containerizer technology. It also provides the criteria for selecting a
> particular type of containerizer.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/containerizer.md PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/home.md d929838206817a6c49cc2343b4de82fa085da682 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41657/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> mesos website docker.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jojy Varghese
> 
>

Reply via email to