> On Dec. 21, 2015, 7:46 a.m., Michael Park wrote:
> > src/master/http.cpp, line 1001
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41472/diff/1/?file=1167118#file1167118line1001>
> >
> >     We actually don't need this `if` statement. Although the `role` field 
> > is marked `optional`, we "fill it in" with the default value of `"*"` if 
> > unspecified by simply calling `role()`. `roleWhitelist` always has `"*"`.
> >     
> >     
> > https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/src/master/master.cpp#L564-L565

But MPark, isn't it invalid to try to reserve resources for `*`? I thought each 
resource in the reserve operation was supposed to have a non-default role set. 
If so, we should either error here for a missing role, or ignore it here and 
error in operation::validate(), where we'd anyway need to validate for an 
explicit `*` (since it would pass the `has_role && isWhitelistedRole` test). 
Doesn't look like the current operation::validate checks that. Seems like a 
separate issue/patch though.


- Adam


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41472/#review111483
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 16, 2015, 2:48 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41472/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 16, 2015, 2:48 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4143
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4143
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Also added a test that dynamic reservations via the "/reserve" endpoint are
> allowed when using implicit roles.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/http.cpp 8dfd67f7d51b8395953d6beb77b2d71bc538eacd 
>   src/tests/reservation_endpoints_tests.cpp 
> b8edd6fafedd4c2221a8d19c1ebc71254071a8c7 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41472/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>

Reply via email to