> On Dec. 29, 2015, 7:32 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/README.md, lines 536-544
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/diff/1/?file=1153951#file1153951line536>
> >
> >     Hm.. since this document is about programming, do we need to say 
> > 'programming notes'? Or is 'notes' enough?
> >     
> >     It would be nice to also explain why we do this.

Updated.


- James


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/#review112206
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 4, 2016, 4:31 p.m., James Peach wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 4, 2016, 4:31 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Document that libprocess ignores SIGPIPE.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/README.md 6a47f6772bb7a74af368ed970af0f1c154a070e3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> None.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James Peach
> 
>

Reply via email to