> On Dec. 29, 2015, 7:32 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > 3rdparty/libprocess/README.md, lines 536-544 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/diff/1/?file=1153951#file1153951line536> > > > > Hm.. since this document is about programming, do we need to say > > 'programming notes'? Or is 'notes' enough? > > > > It would be nice to also explain why we do this.
Updated. - James ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/#review112206 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 4, 2016, 4:31 p.m., James Peach wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 4, 2016, 4:31 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Document that libprocess ignores SIGPIPE. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/README.md 6a47f6772bb7a74af368ed970af0f1c154a070e3 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > None. > > > Thanks, > > James Peach > >
