> On 一月 5, 2016, 1:45 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> > docs/high-availability-framework-guide.md, lines 117-118
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41896/diff/1/?file=1181077#file1181077line117>
> >
> >     What will be the final state of this task? Does the framework need to 
> > re-launch this task again even though this task might already been finished 
> > in agent. Can you please add some best practise for this case?
> 
> Neil Conway wrote:
>     I'm not sure what else we can say here: the best practice we're 
> recommending is to avoid this situation entirely by ensuring that when a new 
> framework leader is elected, it knows about (a superset of) all the tasks the 
> previous leader might have launched.

Can we clarify that the framework may need to re-launch task for such case?


- Guangya


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41896/#review112704
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 一月 5, 2016, 3:14 a.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41896/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 一月 5, 2016, 3:14 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, and Joris Van 
> Remoortere.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3936
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3936
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added guide to writing highly available Mesos frameworks.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/app-framework-development-guide.md 
> 4a43a93d080bdac37b8aee91748fea7552a1cc67 
>   docs/high-availability-framework-guide.md PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/high-availability.md 31aa66220617a3f8606b185ef247c11f00735227 
>   docs/home.md 6f0f4b9cb9d0da1f9960ebe7f36ce186c1317535 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41896/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Previewed via site-docker.
> 
> Note that there's a lot more that could be said here; also, at some point we 
> should probably unify the "reconciliation" page with this page, and perhaps 
> move some of the content in the "high-availability" page here (leaving the 
> "high-availability" page for the operator-centric parts of configuring Mesos 
> to run in HA mode).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>

Reply via email to