> On Jan. 7, 2016, 8:05 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp, line 659
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41726/diff/2/?file=1176463#file1176463line659>
> >
> >     s/int */int* /
> >     Project style guide: 
> > http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/c++-style-guide/
> >     
> >     s/mibDev/mibDevice/?

Done and Done.


> On Jan. 7, 2016, 8:05 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp, line 658
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41726/diff/2/?file=1176463#file1176463line658>
> >
> >     s/xswdSz/xswdSize/

Done.


> On Jan. 7, 2016, 8:05 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp, line 657
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41726/diff/2/?file=1176463#file1176463line657>
> >
> >     Perhaps comment here that FreeBSD supports multiple swap devices and 
> > this sums across them all.

Done.


> On Jan. 7, 2016, 8:05 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp, line 652
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41726/diff/2/?file=1176463#file1176463line652>
> >
> >     s/mibSz/mibSize/

Done.


> On Jan. 7, 2016, 8:05 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp, line 649
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41726/diff/2/?file=1176463#file1176463line649>
> >
> >     s/usedBlks/usedBlocks/

Done.


> On Jan. 7, 2016, 8:05 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp, line 648
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41726/diff/2/?file=1176463#file1176463line648>
> >
> >     s/totalBlks/totalBlocks/

Done.


> On Jan. 7, 2016, 8:05 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp, line 633
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41726/diff/2/?file=1176463#file1176463line633>
> >
> >     Any particular reason why the OSX code above uses sysconf but it's okay 
> > to use getpagesize() on FreeBSD? Are they equivalent...?

On FreeBSD, sysconf() calls getpagesize() for _SC_PAGESIZE (and the man page 
states they are equivelent).

The OS X man page doesn't say if the two are equivelent, and the Linux page 
says to use sysconf for portablility.


> On Jan. 7, 2016, 8:05 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp, line 627
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41726/diff/2/?file=1176463#file1176463line627>
> >
> >     Please use complete words unless it's something defined externally.
> >     s/physMem/physicalMemory/

Done.


> On Jan. 7, 2016, 8:05 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp, line 626
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41726/diff/2/?file=1176463#file1176463line626>
> >
> >     Not yours, but this is getting clumsy. Can you please add a TODO to 
> > refactor this into separate, platform specfic files.

I thought about that while writing this, but didn't want to be presumptuous. 
I'll split things up in another change. Done.


- David


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41726/#review113310
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 8, 2016, 12:52 a.m., David Forsythe wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41726/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 8, 2016, 12:52 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Ian Downes.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4251
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4251
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Implement os::memory() for FreeBSD.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp 
> 4cf693fb7e8c6bb3ad1920ebe90d61f0adb5dc99 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41726/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> gmake check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Forsythe
> 
>

Reply via email to